| Submission
Guidelines |
|
 |
A concise presentation summary is
critical in the evaluation of the proposal, and special care should be
taken in its preparation. |
|
 |
All submissions should take a
strong “solutions orientation” and/or focus on a specific services
application (i.e. applying a solution to a government program, or a
government case study on a successful implementation of a new
innovation). |
|
 |
The case study approach,
illustrating a public sector solution which is relevant for national,
provincial, municipal, or regional levels of government, is the most
preferred type of presentation. Refer to the Case Studies Guidelines
section to assist you in making your submission. |
|
 |
Alternatively, a presentation
format which offers various objective perspectives on a specific topic
or issue will also be given priority. |
|
 |
All submissions should be
presented in a vendor-neutral context. |
|
 |
Presentations on the features and
benefits of a specific product or services suite are not appropriate and
will not be accepted. |
|
 |
As a general rule, session
presentations are restricted to 30 minutes and keynote presentations to
between 40-50 minutes. |
|
 |
No submissions sent by email will
be accepted. All submissions are to be made online. |
|
 |
The deadline for receipt of
submissions for the Govtech 2008 conference is 28 March 2008 |
|
 |
|
 |
| Case Study
Guidelines |
|
|
Case study presentations are particularly helpful to delegates who need
to understand the value of innovation or service being presented. The
following questions are designed to help you structure your case study: |
|
 |
Provide business context for the case study. What was
the business problem which led to the development of the project or
initiative? |
|
 |
Show innovation: Discuss the innovative nature of the
project or project leader. What makes this so special? |
|
 |
Be citizen-centered: What was the bottom-line benefit of
the project or innovation to the citizen? |
|
 |
Demonstrate results: What were the tangible measures of
the success of the project beyond the lessons your team has learned. |
|
 |
Give advice: How can other levels of government
implement the case or apply its learning to existing and future
initiatives. |
|
|
|
|
|